Argumentative essay writing Drugs addiction is the problem, which has gained all its power in the modern society. Thousands of people take drugs and become addicted each day. The majority of them are even under the age of 16, is not it a high time to start discussing this problem without hiding like ostriches in the ground until it is too late? Persuasive Essay on Drug:
Main point of the case a. The main argument of USA suing the Cooperative 3. Various aspects of the case 5. Drug abuse has always been a very delicate question as it always it deals with the health, well-being and even lives of human beings belonging to any country.
The position of the United States of America towards drugs has always been very clear and distinctively negative. Throughout the history of the country there were numerous cases against drug dealers, buyers and many more. These cases did always catch the attention of civil people who by showing interest in such cases revealed their worries about the Persuasive essay about drugs of their own children that one-day might face this Persuasive essay about drugs, too.
As time goes by it get even more clear that people need to feel protection from the side of law-enforcement establishments such as police. Million of people followed the case from its very beginning and did have certain expectations concerning the outcome of the case.
The specifics of the case made people have twofold points of view when analyzing the solution that was delivered by Justice Clarence Thomas concerning the case. Main points of the case.
|My persuasive essay about drugs||Dos The issue is prison. The issue is not legalization or decriminalization because we really do not know if we will ever do those things, or anything like them.|
|Quick Links||Broadway Shows and Musicals in New York, book. Best indoor rower in the world - on sale.|
|Why Buy an Essay Online?||Newsletter Persuasive essay about drugs Yaksas essays in the water cosmology meaning prudencio bertrand josafat argumentative essays webb keane religious language essay chacha nehru essayCitazioni femministe virginia woolf essays ufc post fight argument essay julia pott my first crush essay african american literature essay birth defect research paper buffalo soldier bob marley analysis essay nature in english poetry essay childhood obesity in america research paper aphrodite of knidos essay about myself africa before european arrival dbq essay punctuating quotations in essays do you write methodology on research paper bignerds essays about love sushanta ghoshal dissertation abstracts anesthesiology essay essay 4 all essay on where are you going where have you been essays useful phrases to describe. Dissertation and theses from start to finish Dissertation and theses from start to finish essay writing for environment.|
Summarizing the main point in the opinion of the case it is necessary to start from its very beginning. The case was argued on the 28th of March and the decision was delivered on the 14th of May It was argued intensively and both of the sides were acted rather confident.
The key issue presented by the Cooperative was its medical necessity defense, other words they stated that all the marijuana that was distributed by means of their organization was only distributed according to the medical necessity of this substance by qualified patients.
As it has been already mentioned the District Court made an injunction concerning the activity of the organization and the following consideration of the case lead to the Court of Appeal.
So the reason the United Stated of America charged the organization is for the violation of the policy concerning the distribution and manufacturing of the substance. The main argument of USA suing the Cooperative.
The United States of America on its side presented a tremendously weighty argument that deals with the law of the country in the first place.
The mentioned above Controlled Substances Act is a certain prohibition concerning narcotics, which has been made by experts and considered to be a law. Ordinarily, there is no exception from the law that already exists; it is similar to the situation when the fact of not knowing a certain law does not release from the responsibility for its violation.
The argument of the case was related to the possibility to make an exception concerning the Controlled Substances Act prohibitions. The opinion of the Court basically reflected the next — no distribution should be justified even by medical necessity and no defense should be given to such distributors.
The possibility to make an exception was reviewed in four medical cases: Nevertheless, the decision of the case remained unflinching and by this produced a lot of opposition.
Various aspects of the case. The decision of the court is obviously twofold and makes every person think deeply before expression any kind of opinions. People who really do suffer from hard diseases and may require marijuana might experience certain difficulties and probable complications in their health state.
Therefore hospitals, which previously primarily had to deal with people belonging to this group, find themselves in the situation of inability to help their patients.
This definite case is very complicated due to its connection to the most valuable thing — the life and health of a human being. This ambiguous case may require new statutes or constitutional amendments, due to the statutory ambiguity according to the opinion of some people.
Nevertheless, this ambiguity is rather questionable and the Controlled Substances Act points it rather clearly. It seems that it is better to find a medical substitute of marijuana, which is easier to do nowadays when medicine keeps providing new innovative medicaments, than it was for instance, 30 years ago.
And maybe this is one of the primary reasons the Controlled Substance Act becomes so restrictive. It is obvious that it was designed in order to protect the health of the citizens of the country from drug-dependence and therefore any statement claiming that it will kill people has no base under itself.
It was a case of health v. Is marijuana that advisable after all? This was the main question that the Court answered by its decision. It is obvious that this case did touch certain moral issues, as the case was about the health of human beings.
Analyzing the destructive influence of marijuana in general it is necessary to remember that marijuana does more harm than it does good.
Therefore, would not it be the main question to stop the outcry against the policy. A narcotic will always remain a narcotic; even the famous genius Sigmund Fried went through this trying to treat people. Why should we do it?A persuasive essay is a type of writing that attempts to convince the reader that the opinions being presented are right.
They are very similar to argumentative essays except for the fact a writer presents a one-sided opinion giving valid reasons and solid facts on why that opinion or argument is correct. Drug abuse The level of drug abuse in the US has increased a lot hence leading to the creation of whether some drugs should be legalized in the country or not.
The common notion of drug abuse is that it leads to negative impacts in the body and thinking of the person involved. Drug Abuse (Argumentative Essay Sample) June 2, by admin. Few people deny the dangers of drug use, while many teens are curious about drugs. They should stay away from drugs because drugs affect our health, lead to academic failure, and jeopardizes safety.
Drugs are used from a long period of time in many countries. The concentration of drugs has increased. Free Example of Argumentative Sample essay on Drug Abuse. regardbouddhiste.com Custom Essay Writing Service. Drug Abuse Essay. Table of contents: 1. Introduction.
2. Main point of the case. a. The main argument of USA suing the Cooperative Drugs may destroy the life of a person, therefore while fighting with drug dealers and buyers. Persuasive Essay - Say No to Drugs. 3 Pages Words February Saved essays Save your essays here so you can locate them quickly!
Nov 17, · My Persuasive Essay is on Performance-Enhancing Drugs in Sports. Thesis Statement. All athletes should be required to take a drug test before any sporting event they participate in to make sure that the playing field is leveled out equally for all competing athletes.